A periodical of the Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences, UMYU, Katsina
ISSN: 2955 – 1145 (print); 2955 – 1153 (online)
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE
1* Fiddausi Dayyabu, 1Mustapha Zakariyya Karkarna , 2 Nura Umar Kura, and 3Surayya Farouk Durumin iya
1Department of Environmental Management, Faculty of Earth and Environmental Science, Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria.
2Department of Environmental Science, Federal University Dutse, Jigawa State. Nigeria.
3Department of Chemistry, Yusuf Maitama Sule University, Kano, Nigeria
*Corresponding author E-mail: 1[email protected]
Groundwater is the primary source of domestic water in Kano Metropolis, yet its quality is increasingly threatened by rapid urbanization and anthropogenic activities. This study evaluated the spatiotemporal variation in groundwater quality using systematic sampling and multivariate statistical approaches. Forty-eight water samples (24 boreholes and 24 wells) were purposely collected across eight Local Government Areas during dry and wet seasons (feb-sept 2023). Physicochemical parameters were analyzed in line with WHO standards. Results indicated significant seasonal differences, with higher contamination observed during the dry season. Chloride concentrations peaked at 579.38 mg L⁻¹, turbidity at 8.01 NTU, and total dissolved solids (TDS) at 538 mg L⁻¹, both exceeding WHO permissible limits and posing potential risks of salinity-related health effects. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) identified four key factors explaining 76.1% of the total variance, attributed to salinity and mineralization, carbonate buffering, organic contamination, and sulphate enrichment. Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering (AHC) distinguished boreholes, which showed relative stability, from wells, which were highly susceptible to surface contamination. Hydrochemical facies plots from Piper diagrams revealed dominance of Ca–Mg–SO₄–Cl and Ca–Mg–Cl–SO₄ water types, reflecting both geogenic and anthropogenic influences. The findings demonstrate that groundwater in Kano is vulnerable to deterioration from industrial effluents, poor sanitation, and unregulated land-use practices. To mitigate contamination risks, the study recommends an integrated groundwater management strategy that includes continuous monitoring, stricter waste disposal regulations, improved well and borehole siting, and community education on water safety. These interventions are critical to ensuring long-term groundwater sustainability and safeguarding public health in the metropolis.
Keywords: Groundwater quality, PCA, Cluster Analysis, Seasonal variation, GIS mapping, Kano Metropolis, Physicochemical parameters
Groundwater resources, despite their critical role in sustaining human and ecological systems, are increasingly under threat from both natural and anthropogenic pressures. Population growth, urban expansion, unregulated waste disposal, agricultural intensification, and industrialization are among the leading drivers of human-induced contamination worldwide (Ashraf et al., 2017; Lapworth et al., 2022). In developing countries, particularly across Sub-Saharan Africa, these risks are exacerbated by weak institutional capacity, ineffective land-use planning, inadequate waste management practices, and limited public awareness of the environmental and health implications (Balogun et al., 2021).
In Nigeria, groundwater is the dominant and, in many areas, the only reliable source of drinking water. This dependence is particularly pronounced in urban and peri-urban communities where municipal water supply systems are often inadequate or entirely absent (Talabi, 2018; Tukur et al., 2018). The Nigerian Ministry of Water Resources reports that only 39% of the population has access to safely managed drinking water, forcing most households to rely on boreholes, hand-dug wells, and other informal groundwater abstraction systems (Omole, 2018). Such heavy reliance, compounded by weak quality control mechanisms and minimal water safety awareness, significantly heightens the risks of public health hazards (Lapworth et al., 2017; Shaikh & Birajdar, 2024).
The physicochemical integrity of groundwater serves as a key determinant of its suitability for drinking, domestic, agricultural, and industrial purposes. Parameters including pH, electrical conductivity (EC), total dissolved solids (TDS), nitrates, chlorides, sulphates, fluoride, iron, and heavy metals provide vital insights into both natural hydrogeological processes and contamination from human activities. Exceedances of World Health Organization (WHO) thresholds pose serious health consequences, ranging from methemoglobinemia and skeletal damage to kidney dysfunction, neurological disorders, and cancer (WHO, 2019).
Rapid urbanization in Nigerian cities further amplifies risks to groundwater quality (Aliyu & Amadu, 2017). Kano Metropolis, Northern Nigeria’s largest and most industrialized urban center, exemplifies this challenge. With a population exceeding four million, the city’s water demand far outpaces its municipal supply, forcing households, industries, and small-scale enterprises to rely on shallow wells and boreholes for their daily water needs (Ibrahim, 2019; Shawai et al., 2019). However, many of these abstraction points are located dangerously close to pollution hotspots such as fuel stations, dumpsites, abattoirs, pit latrines, and informal industries (Tukur et al., 2018; Mukhtar, 2021).
The region’s fractured basement complex geology and permeable formations further intensify aquifer vulnerability by accelerating the infiltration of contaminants (Dauda & Ali, 2024). Combined with uncontrolled land-use practices, this hydrogeological sensitivity exacerbates risks to public health and ecosystems. Kano State’s recurring cholera outbreaks, recorded annually since 1970 with high case fatality ratios between 4.98% in 2010 and 5.10% in 2018, highlight the urgent intersection of water contamination and disease burdens (NLM, 2021).
How do the primary sources of contamination such as salinity, organic waste, sulphate differ between borehole water and open well water in Kano Metropolis?
To what extent does seasonal variation (dry vs. wet season) affect the concentration of key pollutants like chloride, nitrate, and turbidity in the groundwater?
Kano Metropolis comprises eight Local Government Areas (LGAs): Dala, Fagge, Gwale, Municipal, Nassarawa, Tarauni, Kumbotso, and Ungogo. The metropolis covers approximately 499 km² and is situated at an altitude of 472 meters above sea level. It lies between latitudes 11°05′N and 12°07′N, and longitudes 8°23′E and 8°47′E. The metropolis is bordered to the northeast by Minjibir LGA, to the east by Gezawa LGA, to the southeast by Dawakin Kudu LGA, and to the west by Madobi and Tofa LGAs (Figure 1). Kano Metropolis has experienced significant urban growth and transformation in recent decades, characterized by increased human activities, rapid land-use changes, and the convergence of various socio-environmental challenges (Barau et al., 2015). It is Nigeria’s second-largest commercial hub after Lagos and the most prominent urban center in the Hausa region. Historically, it has played a vital role as a major commercial center in the Sudan region and has maintained a long-standing sedentary population organized under a traditional emirate system (Boyi et al., 2017).
The study area lies within the semi-arid region of northern Nigeria and falls predominantly within the Sudan savannah vegetation zone. However, the southern fringes of the state extend into the Guinea savannah zone. Other localized vegetation types exist, especially along river channels and floodplains, where dense vegetation flourishes. Savannah woodlands are preserved in areas like the Falgore Game Reserve (Ali, 2012). The climate of the study area is classified as tropical wet and dry. The wet season spans approximately four to five months, typically from May to September, with peak rainfall occurring in August. Annual rainfall ranges between 250 mm and 850 mm, and is largely influenced by the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) (Olofin and Tanko, 2002; Boyi et al., 2017). Drainage in the area is controlled by topography and features several rivers, including the Jakara, Challawa, Watari, and Kano Rivers. The Jakara River constitutes the most extensive drainage network within Kano Metropolis (Mustapha et al., 2013). The Challawa River is fed by several tributaries such as Magaga, Takwami, Guzu-guzu, Kutumbulu, and Iyaka. Drainage density in the area has been reported to influence groundwater quality due to the dynamics of surface runoff and infiltration (Rilwanu, 2014). Land use in the metropolis is diverse and comprises residential, commercial, agricultural, institutional, educational, and industrial zones. Industrial activities are concentrated in designated layouts such as Dakata, Sharada, and Bompai, which host steel rolling mills, food and beverage plants, packaging facilities, and rice processing industries. Commercial activities are distributed throughout the metropolis, with notable markets including Sabon-Gari, Kantin-Kwari, Singer, Dawanau, and Yankaba markets (Isa et al., 2016; Haruna et al., 2019).
Figure 1: Map of Kano Metropolis, Kano State
Source: Cartography Lab Geography Department BUK (2024)
An experimental research design was adopted, combining systematic field sampling, laboratory analysis, and statistical modeling. Kano Metropolis, covering approximately 499 km², was stratified into representative zones to ensure adequate spatial coverage. Groundwater samples were collected in triplicate at each site across seasons to minimize variability. Standard quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) protocols, including field blanks, duplicates, and instrument calibration logs, were strictly observed. Detection limits for trace major ions were maintained in line with the specifications of AAS and ion chromatography. This design ensured reliable assessment of groundwater quality, contaminant transport, and seasonal dynamics.
The study was carried out across the eight Local Government Areas in Kano Metropolis (Nassarawa, Tarauni, Fagge, Kumbotso, Ungoggo, Gwale, Municipal, and Dala). Due to the large geographic scope of the study area, it was not feasible to cover every location. Therefore, a systematic random sampling technique was used. A total of 48 groundwater samples (borehole and open well) were collected. The sampling approach involved purposive sampling, where triplicate sampling points were selected from densely populated areas. Groundwater samples were collected in both the dry and rainy seasons, resulting in a total of forty-eight water samples to estimate the variability caused by the sampling and analytical procedures. The sampling points were identified using satellite images. The samples were selected to represent various geological formations and land-use patterns. The sample selection was based on the sources of water within the area. The technique was also used due to the homogeneous nature of the study area; the sources of water in the streets, roads, and wards in the study area are almost the same. This sampling method was chosen to ensure an even distribution across the population, which was crucial for mapping and modeling.
In order to attain (APHA) standard, before embarking on any sampling exercise, the water containers (polyethylene bottles) was subjected to an acid wash with 5% nitric acid (HNO3) and rinsed with distilled water. For every sampling point, the water level was measured, followed by emptying the tube well three times or pumping the water out of the borehole for at least 10 minutes before taking water samples (Isa et al., 2012). This is to guarantee that the samples collected are truly represent the groundwater and not the stagnant water. A total of 48 sampling sites (24 boreholes and 24 open wells) were utilized in this research work. Sampling exercises were carried out for a period of eight consecutive months, during which triplicates of groundwater samples were collected from each of the 8 Local Government Areas. The samples collected were used for the analysis of physicochemical and microbial contaminants.
In-situ parameters, including dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, Electrical conductivity (EC), temperature (Temp), and turbidity (Tur), were measured in the field during sample collection. The pH of the water samples was determined using a portable Hanna microprocessor pH meter. Electrical Conductivity was analyzed using a Jenway conductivity meter (model 4510). Total dissolved solids (TDS), Turbidity, and Temperature were measured using a multi-parameter WP600 series meter. Other parameters, such as Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) and Dissolved Oxygen (DO), were analyzed using a water quality meter by standard methods outlined in the World Health Organization (WHO, 2011). All of which will be measured in situ because they change within a short time (Dayyabu et al., 2025).
Major anions like bicarbonate (HCO3) and chloride (Cl) were analyzed through titration within the shortest possible time, while NO3 and SO4 were analyzed using a HACH (DR/2000) meter with 25 mL samples (APHA, 2005). The samples were filtered using a 0.45 μm filter paper (Whatman Milipores, Clifton, NJ, USA), and HNO3 acid was added to bring the pH below 2 (Belkhiria et al., 2012; APHA, 2005). The samples were stored at 4 °C and then transported to the laboratory for analysis of the major cations (Ca, Mg, Na, and K) using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS) (Kura et al., 2018).
The risk assessment approach followed the US EPA method for non-carcinogenic risk evaluation. The Hazard Quotient (HQ) was computed as:
\[HQ = \frac{C}{RfD}\]
Where C is the mean concentration (mg/L) and RfD is the WHO reference dose or permissible limit. For parameters with WHO ranges, the lower limit was used for calculation. For parameters with no WHO guideline (e.g., Temperature, EC, Ca, Mg, Na), HQ was not computed. The Hazard Index (HI) was obtained by summing the HQs for each season. An HI > 1 indicates a potential health concern, while HI < 1 suggests a negligible risk.
Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, range) were computed. Sample adequacy was verified using the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin test (KMO > 0.60) and Bartlett’s test of sphericity (p < 0.05). Principal Component Analysis (PCA) extracted key contamination factors based on eigenvalues greater than 1 and scree plot criteria. Cluster Analysis employed Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering with Ward’s linkage and squared Euclidean distance.
The paired sample t-test revealed significant temporal variability in groundwater quality, with most parameters exhibiting differences between the wet and dry seasons. The higher concentrations of TDS, turbidity, and chloride during the dry season may be linked to reduced dilution effects and increased evaporation, consistent with findings by Ezea et al. (2022) in Nigeria, who observed seasonal influences on spring water quality using WHO standards. Elevated bicarbonate and dissolved oxygen in the wet season reflect enhanced recharge and aeration from rainfall, in line with Adimalla and Qian (2019), who reported similar patterns in agricultural groundwater systems of South India.
Hazard Quotient analysis indicated that chloride, dissolved oxygen, and bicarbonate contributed most to health risks in both seasons, consistent with observations by Chakraborty et al. (2022), who highlighted bicarbonate and nitrate enrichment as critical factors in seasonal water quality assessments. Although BOD, Mg, and Na did not vary significantly, their values remained within permissible limits, suggesting minimal impact on water safety. Overall, the study highlights the seasonal influences on hydrochemistry, with water from the dry season exhibiting greater contamination stress. This aligns with global evidence that climatic factors and anthropogenic inputs significantly influence groundwater quality dynamics, underscoring the importance of continuous monitoring and sustainable management.
The Hazard Quotient (HQ) results indicate that chloride, dissolved oxygen, and bicarbonate are the primary contributors to non-carcinogenic risks, particularly in the dry season when contamination stress intensifies, highlighting the seasonal influence of hydrogeochemistry. This finding aligns with Chakraborty et al. (2022), who emphasized the importance of bicarbonate and nitrate enrichment in seasonal water quality dynamics. It also aligns with the findings from Cherif et al. (2020) in Morocco and Jain et al. (2021) in India, where seasonal and anthropogenic factors were found to govern HQ outcomes. Therefore, continuous monitoring and sustainable management are crucial for mitigating groundwater risks.
Table 1: Spatial Variation of Groundwater Quality Parameters ANOVA and Duncan Multiple Range Test Analysis
| Parameters | Locations | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tarauni | Gwale | Dala | Nassarawa | Fagge | Ungogo | KMC | WHO | |
| Temp (°C) | 25.38 ± 2.82ᵃ | 25.82 ± 1.99ᵃ | 26.52 ± 2.16ᵃ | 25.83 ± 1.98ᵃ | 25.96 ± 1.79ᵃ | 25.37 ± 2.30ᵃ | 25.40 ± 2.51ᵃ | - |
| pH | 7.35 ± 0.64ᵇᶜ | 7.18 ± 0.27ᵃᵇᶜ | 6.70 ± 0.31ᵃ | 7.34 ± 0.55ᵇᶜ | 7.54 ± 0.68ᶜ | 7.40 ± 0.48ᶜ | 7.08 ± 0.29ᵃᵇᶜ | 6.5-8.5 |
| DO (mg/l) | 5.55 ± 0.55ᵇᶜ | 5.34 ± 0.31ᵃᵇ | 5.41 ± 0.28ᵃᵇᶜ | 5.12 ± 0.39ᵃ | 5.71 ± 0.37ᵇᶜ | 5.11 ± 0.38ᵃ | 5.77 ± 0.58ᶜ | 5-8 |
| BOD (mg/l) | 1.32 ± 0.22ᵇᶜ | 1.39 ± 0.40ᵇᶜ | 1.32 ± 0.35ᵇᶜ | 1.28 ± 0.54ᵇ | 1.61 ± 0.26ᶜ | 1.14 ± 0.34ᵇ | 1.23 ± 0.25ᵇ | 5-30 |
| TDS (mg/l) | 315.63 ± 204.79ᵃ | 315.63 ± 204.79ᵃ | 315.63 ± 204.79ᵃ | 315.63 ± 204.79ᵃ | 315.63 ± 204.79ᵃ | 315.63 ± 204.79ᵃ | 315.63 ± 204.79ᵃ | 500-1500 |
| Turb (NTU) | 2.84 ± 1.42ᵃᵇᶜ | 4.86 ± 2.19ᵈ | 5.88 ± 1.03ᵈᵉ | 4.08 ± 1.69ᵇᶜ | 6.37 ± 1.84ᵉ | 3.53 ± 1.25ᵃᵇᶜ | 4.84 ± 1.94ᶜᵈ | <5 |
| EC (µS/cm) | 240.89 ± 57.72ᵃᵇ | 277.88 ± 78.57ᵇ | 233.24 ± 73.16ᵃᵇ | 196.50 ± 116.72ᵃ | 230.65 ± 91.56ᵃᵇ | 216.92 ± 77.30ᵃᵇ | 238.54 ± 51.97ᵃᵇ | - |
| NO3 (mg/l) | 3.06 ± 3.08ᵇ | 1.70 ± 0.68ᵃ | 1.44 ± 0.44ᵃ | 1.40 ± 0.54ᵃ | 1.54 ± 0.64ᵃ | 1.40 ± 0.35ᵃ | 1.52 ± 0.88ᵃ | <50 |
| Cl (mg/l) | 392.20 ± 211.55ᵇ | 318.73 ± 178.56ᵃᵇ | 241.37 ± 62.98ᵃ | 306.98 ± 207.73ᵃᵇ | 272.49 ± 161.83ᵃᵇ | 297.08 ± 98.40ᵃᵇ | 374.05 ± 156.15ᵃᵇ | 250 |
| HCO3 (mg/l) | 210.35 ± 268.49ᵇ | 101.58 ± 62.06ᵃ | 70.51 ± 29.37ᵃ | 132.13 ± 62.77ᵃᵇ | 150.02 ± 81.63ᵃᵇ | 163.85 ± 67.27ᵃᵇ | 154.80 ± 73.04ᵃᵇ | < 200 |
| SO4 (mg/l) | 0.61 ± 0.13ᵃᵇ | 0.77 ± 0.46ᵇ | 0.60 ± 0.37ᵃᵇ | 0.59 ± 0.20ᵃᵇ | 0.36 ± 0.15ᵃ | 0.81 ± 0.93ᵇ | 0.33 ± 0.23ᵃ | 500 |
| Ca (mg/l) | 0.74 ± 0.25ᵈ | 0.65 ± 0.20ᶜᵈ | 0.59 ± 0.22ᵇᶜᵈ | 0.69 ± 0.24ᵈ | 0.42 ± 0.19ᵃᵇ | 0.49 ± 0.09ᵃᵇᶜ | 0.45 ± 0.13ᵃᵇ | - |
| Mg (mg/l) | 0.40 ± 0.10ᵃ | 0.34 ± 0.13ᵃ | 3.22 ± 9.57ᵃ | 0.31 ± 0.13ᵃ | 0.45 ± 0.04ᵃ | 0.28 ± 0.08ᵃ | 0.46 ± 0.06ᵃ | - |
| Na (mg/l) | 0.32 ± 0.08ᵃ | 1.57 ± 4.35ᵃ | 0.30 ± 0.17ᵃ | 0.35 ± 0.10ᵃ | 0.30 ± 0.09ᵃ | 0.23 ± 0.19ᵃ | 0.29 ± 0.14ᵃ | - |
| K (mg/l) | 0.59 ± 0.36ᵃᵇ | 0.62 ± 0.23ᵃᵇ | 0.55 ± 0.36ᵃ | 0.56 ± 0.15ᵃ | 0.44 ± 0.18ᵃ | 0.85 ± 0.42ᵇ | 0.73 ± 0.46ᵃᵇ | <12 |
Values are mean ± SD of the parameters in the various LGAs. Mean values with different superscripts across the rows differ significantly (p<0.05).
Table 2: Temporal Variability of Groundwater Quality Parameters using Paired Sample t-Test
| Parameter | Wet Season (Mean ± SD) | Dry Season (Mean ± SD) | t-value | p-value | HQ (Wet) | HQ (Dry) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temp (°C) | 24.20 ± 0.96 | 27.42 ± 1.82 | -9.834 | 0.000** | n/a | n/a |
| pH | 6.90 ± 0.42 | 7.46 ± 0.60 | -6.004 | 0.000** | n/a | n/a |
| DO (mg/l) | 5.68 ± 0.40 | 5.11 ± 0.39 | 11.241 | 0.000** | 1.136 | 1.022 |
| BOD (mg/l) | 1.23 ± 0.35 | 1.31 ± 0.43 | -1.354 | 0.182 | 0.246 | 0.262 |
| TDS (mg/l) | 183.60 ± 82.16 | 454.01 ± 202.39 | -13.336 | 0.000** | 0.367 | 0.908 |
| Turb (NTU) | 4.05 ± 1.35 | 4.64 ± 2.50 | -2.094 | 0.042** | 0.810 | 0.928 |
| EC (µS/cm) | 272.32 ± 85.67 | 197.71 ± 48.32 | 6.183 | 0.000** | n/a | n/a |
| NO3 (mg/l) | 1.00 ± 0.26 | 2.29 ± 1.58 | -5.672 | 0.000** | 0.020 | 0.046 |
| Cl (mg/l) | 296.25 ± 162.89 | 324.00 ± 153.51 | -2.112 | 0.040** | 1.185 | 1.296 |
| HCO3 (mg/l) | 201.25 ± 130.89 | 63.87 ± 26.80 | 7.406 | 0.000** | 1.006 | 0.319 |
| SO4 (mg/l) | 0.66 ± 0.58 | 0.44 ± 0.20 | 2.935 | 0.005** | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Ca (mg/l) | 0.64 ± 0.22 | 0.47 ± 0.21 | 6.334 | 0.000** | n/a | n/a |
| Mg (mg/l) | 0.33 ± 0.10 | 1.10 ± 4.79 | -1.112 | 0.272 | n/a | n/a |
| Na (mg/l) | 0.25 ± 0.10 | 0.65 ± 2.18 | -1.264 | 0.212 | n/a | n/a |
| K (mg/l) | 0.70 ± 0.36 | 0.51 ± 0.26 | 4.643 | 0.000** | 0.058 | 0.043 |
** Significantly differ at 0.05 level of significance
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) levels were significantly higher in the dry season (454.01 ± 202.39 mg/l) compared to the wet season (183.60 ± 82.16 mg/l), as indicated by the high t-value of -13.336 (p = 0.000). The negative t-value reflects the direction of the change, with higher TDS levels during the dry season. This increase is likely due to evaporation concentrating dissolved salts and reduced dilution from rainfall during the dry season. The large magnitude of the t-value underscores the significant seasonal effect on TDS, highlighting the role of evaporation in altering groundwater salinity.
Turbidity (Turb) was significantly higher in the dry season (4.64 ± 2.50 NTU) compared to the wet season (4.05 ± 1.35 NTU), with a t-value of -2.094 (p = 0.042). The negative t-value indicates an increase in turbidity during the dry season. This increase may result from reduced water flow and increased suspended solids from erosion or anthropogenic activities during the dry season. The moderate t-value suggests a noticeable but less pronounced seasonal effect on turbidity.
Nitrate (NO₃) levels were significantly higher in the dry season (2.29 ± 1.58 mg/l) compared to the wet season (1.00 ± 0.26 mg/l), with a t-value of -5.672 (p = 0.000). The negative t-value indicates an increase in nitrate concentrations during the dry season. This increase may result from reduced dilution and increased concentration of agricultural or industrial contaminants during the dry season. The significant t-value highlights the role of rainfall in diluting nitrate concentrations.
The Chloride (Cl) levels were significantly higher in the dry season (324.00 ± 153.51 mg/l) compared to the wet season (296.25 ± 162.89 mg/l), as indicated by the t-value of -2.112 (p = 0.040). The negative t-value reflects the direction of the change, with higher chloride levels during the dry season. This increase is likely due to evaporation concentrating chloride ions and reduced dilution from rainfall during the dry season. The moderate t-value suggests a noticeable but less pronounced seasonal effect on chloride concentrations.
The spatial distribution maps (Figures 2a–5b) present a detailed portrayal of hotspot areas of groundwater quality in Kano Metropolis, comparing seasonal variations between the wet and dry periods. These maps not only reveal the essential geochemical characteristics of the aquifers but also highlight the influence of climatic conditions and anthropogenic activities on groundwater quality.
Figures 2a and 2b illustrate the spatial distribution of Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) across the study area. During the wet season, TDS values range from 198.38 to 758.19 mg/L, with most of the area exhibiting values between 338.33 and 618.24 mg/L. Within this season, localized patches show both lower TDS values (198.38–336.33 mg/L) and peak concentrations (618.24–758.19 mg/L). In contrast, the dry season is characterized by lower TDS levels, ranging from 93.4 to 318.10 mg/L, with the majority of the study area falling between 149.66 and 261.96 mg/L. These elevated TDS concentrations during the wet season are indicative of enhanced mineral dissolution and recharge processes that contribute to the concentration of dissolved solids in the groundwater.
Turbidity maps (Figures 3a and 3b) revealed a consistent spatial distribution for both seasons. In the wet season, most groundwater samples exhibit turbidity values ranging from 3.14 to 6.22 NTU, while in the dry season, the values mostly fall between 3.10 and 6.95 NTU.
Figure 2: Spatial Distribution of Groundwater TDS (a) in Wet Season (b) in Dry Season
Figure 3: .Spatial Distribution of Groundwater Turbidity (a) in Wet Season (b) in Dry Season
Figure 4: Spatial Distribution of Groundwater Nitrate (a) in Wet Season (b) in Dry Season
Figure 5: Spatial Distribution of Groundwater Chloride (a) in Wet Season (b) in Dry Season
During the wet season, the lowest turbidity (1.60–3.14 NTU) is observed in the northeastern section of Ungogo, the southern part of Gwale, and near the confluence of Nassarawa, Fagge, Tarauni, and Kano Municipal LGAs. Conversely, the highest turbidity values (6.22–7.76 NTU) appear to the west of Nassarawa and east of Fagge. In the dry season, peak turbidity (6.95–8.87 NTU) is scattered across densely populated LGAs, while the lowest values (1.17–3.10 NTU) are found throughout Tarauni, parts of southern Nassarawa and Fagge, the eastern section of Kano Municipal, and the mid-eastern region of Kumbotso LGA. Overall, the groundwater in the study area appears generally clear, except in localized zones with elevated turbidity levels.
The spatial distribution of Nitrate (NO₃), as illustrated in Figures 4a and 4b, exhibits a distinct seasonal variation, with higher concentrations observed during the dry season (0.86–9.29 mg/L) compared to the wet season (0.43–1.64 mg/L). During the wet season, NO₃ concentrations predominantly range between 1.03 and 1.64 mg/L in the western section of the metropolis, while lower values (0.43–1.03 mg/L) are more common in the eastern section. In contrast, the dry season map reveals that a significant portion of the metropolis falls within the lower concentration range of 0.86–2.97 mg/L. Mid-range values (2.97–5.08 mg/L) are concentrated in Tarauni, the southwestern part of Nassarawa, and the eastern section of Kumbotso LGAs. The highest concentrations (5.08–9.29 mg/L) are recorded in the southwestern part of Nassarawa and the northern section of Tarauni LGAs. However, the observed seasonal variations suggest potential influences from surface activities and hydrogeological processes. The lower NO₃ concentrations in the wet season may be attributed to dilution effects caused by increased recharge and infiltration of rainwater. Conversely, higher concentrations during the dry season could result from reduced dilution, increased evapotranspiration, and potential leaching of accumulated nitrates from agricultural runoff, sewage, and other anthropogenic sources.
The spatial distribution of chloride, as illustrated in Figures 5a and 5b, reveals distinct seasonal variations. During the wet season, chloride concentrations range from a low of 94.61 to 242.25 mg/L to a peak of 537.53–685.17 mg/L. In contrast, the dry season exhibits slightly different patterns, with chloride values ranging from 124.60 to 227.22 mg/L at the lower end and peaking at 432.45–535.07 mg/L. In the wet season, the majority of the study area is dominated by moderate chloride levels between 242.26 and 389.89 mg/L, spanning across all LGAs. The highest concentrations, ranging from 537.53 to 685.17 mg/L, are observed in isolated pockets, particularly at the confluence of Tarauni, Nassarawa, Kumbotso, and Kano Municipal LGAs. During the dry season, most sections of the metropolis exhibit mid-range chloride concentrations, ranging from 227.22 to 432.45 mg/L. The highest values, ranging from 432.45 to 535.07 mg/L, appear sporadically in densely populated areas, likely reflecting anthropogenic influences such as domestic wastewater discharge and industrial activities. This seasonal variation suggests that both natural hydrogeological processes and human activities influence chloride levels.
The factors controlling groundwater quality were analyzed using Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering (AHC) to identify key contamination sources, spatial trends, and relationships among groundwater quality parameters. Also, a Piper trilinear diagram was deployed for the hydrogeochemical characterization of groundwater in the study area.
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was applied to the 15 physicochemical parameters and yielded 15 components; however, only components with an eigenvalue greater than 1 were considered to be the most important (O’Rourke et al., 2005; Kura et al., 2013). The scree plot (Figure 2) of the eigenvalues demonstrates a steep decline in variance explained after the fourth component, confirming that only these four factors are necessary for interpretation. The remaining components contribute minimal variance, indicating that they primarily represent less influential processes.
The eigenvalues and cumulative variance, as indicated in Table 1, showed that the first four principal components (F1–F4) collectively explain 76.1% of the total variance in the groundwater dataset. The first component (F1) alone accounts for 30.0% of the total variance, while the second component (F2) explains 26.1%, making them the most dominant factors influencing groundwater quality. The third (F3) and fourth (F4) components contribute 12.6% and 7.3% of the variance, respectively.
The factor loadings offer insight into the specific variables that influence each principal component. The first component (F1), which accounts for 30.0% of the variance, has high positive loadings for chloride (Cl), total dissolved solids (TDS), turbidity, electrical conductivity (EC), sulphate (SO₄), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and potassium (K), represents salinity and mineralization in the groundwater.
Table 3: Factor Loadings after Varimax Rotation
| Variables | Components | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | |
| Temp | 0.278 | -0.852 | 0.026 | -0.105 |
| pH | 0.458 | -0.564 | -0.216 | 0.347 |
| DO | 0.397 | 0.658 | 0.477 | -0.184 |
| BOD | -0.505 | -0.211 | 0.634 | 0.308 |
| TDS | 0.706 | -0.556 | -0.170 | -0.141 |
| Turb | 0.542 | -0.013 | 0.670 | 0.083 |
| EC | 0.632 | 0.481 | -0.095 | -0.021 |
| NO₃⁻ | 0.424 | -0.743 | -0.009 | 0.232 |
| Cl⁻ | 0.901 | 0.059 | -0.122 | -0.128 |
| HCO₃⁻ | 0.122 | 0.850 | 0.153 | 0.126 |
| SO₄²⁻ | 0.568 | 0.281 | -0.262 | 0.628 |
| Ca²⁺ | 0.623 | 0.500 | 0.027 | 0.340 |
| Mg²⁺ | 0.538 | -0.318 | 0.561 | -0.192 |
| Na⁺ | 0.477 | -0.231 | 0.405 | -0.090 |
| K⁺ | 0.612 | 0.313 | -0.375 | -0.415 |
| Eigenvalue | 4.502 | 3.921 | 1.890 | 1.100 |
| Variability (%) | 30.007 | 26.139 | 12.598 | 7.335 |
| Cumulative % | 30.007 | 56.146 | 68.744 | 76.079 |
TABLE 4: Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy
| TEMP | 0.688 |
|---|---|
| pH | 0.738 |
| DO | 0.586 |
| BOD | 0.542 |
| TDS | 0.663 |
| TURB | 0.645 |
| EC | 0.620 |
| No3 | 0.658 |
| Cl | 0.571 |
| HCO3 | 0.683 |
| SO4 | 0.472 |
| Ca | 0.718 |
| Mg | 0.386 |
| Na | 0.102 |
| k | 0.593 |
| KMO | 0.606 |
TABLE 5: COMMUNALITIES
| Variable | Observations | Obs. with missing data | Obs. without missing data | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Std. deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEMP | 32 | 0 | 32 | 22.300 | 29.500 | 25.813 | 2.113 |
| pH | 32 | 0 | 32 | 6.000 | 8.600 | 7.194 | 0.579 |
| DO | 32 | 0 | 32 | 4.600 | 6.600 | 5.425 | 0.458 |
| BOD | 32 | 0 | 32 | 0.610 | 1.930 | 1.270 | 0.358 |
| TDS | 32 | 0 | 32 | 94.000 | 759.000 | 321.775 | 211.321 |
| TURB | 32 | 0 | 32 | 1.380 | 8.630 | 4.360 | 2.046 |
| EC | 32 | 0 | 32 | 105.500 | 392.800 | 236.831 | 79.367 |
| No3 | 32 | 0 | 32 | 0.550 | 3.540 | 1.530 | 0.718 |
| Cl | 32 | 0 | 32 | 94.300 | 687.030 | 314.076 | 158.793 |
| HCO3 | 32 | 0 | 32 | 26.400 | 652.800 | 132.933 | 118.048 |
| SO4 | 32 | 0 | 32 | 0.050 | 1.501 | 0.506 | 0.305 |
| Ca | 32 | 0 | 32 | 0.150 | 1.140 | 0.553 | 0.226 |
| Mg | 32 | 0 | 32 | 0.188 | 22.600 | 1.066 | 3.931 |
| Na | 32 | 0 | 32 | 0.070 | 2.810 | 0.374 | 0.467 |
| k | 32 | 0 | 32 | 0.130 | 3.183 | 0.696 | 0.555 |
Figure 6: Scree Plot
Figure 7: Factor Loadings Plot
The PCA results reveal that both natural hydrogeochemical processes and anthropogenic activities shape groundwater quality in Kano Metropolis. The dominance of F1 (34.8%), associated with salinity and mineralization (Na, Cl, TDS, and temperature), highlights the influence of parent rock dissolution and aquifer–rock interactions, a trend also observed by Adimalla & Qian (2019) in South India, where groundwater salinity was primarily linked to water–rock interactions and evaporite mineral dissolution. The additional contribution from industrial effluents and agricultural inputs aligns with the findings of Ezea et al. (2022), who reported that anthropogenic factors significantly affect groundwater salinity in peri-urban Nigerian settings.
The F8 component (26.1%), reflecting the carbonate buffering system (HCO₃, Ca, DO, EC), demonstrates the role of carbonate dissolution and recharge dynamics. Similar results were presented by Chakraborty et al. (2022), who found that bicarbonate–calcium dominance indicated buffering effects and recharge influence in Indian plateau aquifers. The high DO association here suggests zones of active infiltration, implying groundwater vulnerability to surface contamination. F9 (12.6%), dominated by BOD, turbidity, and Mg, indicates organic and microbial contamination, likely from wastewater, septic leakage, and runoff. This parallels observations by Chakraborty et al. (2022), who found turbidity and BOD as markers of microbial pollution in shallow aquifers.
Finally, F10 (7.3%), with strong sulphate loading, reflects localized contamination from fertilizers and industrial sources. This trend is consistent with Ezea et al. (2022), who highlighted sulphate enrichment from fertilizer leaching in Nigerian aquifers. The PCA biplot further demonstrates spatial clustering of sampling sites, distinguishing zones influenced by salinity and anthropogenic stress (WF1, WF2, WC1, WC2, WD1, WD2) from recharge-dominated, better-buffered sites (BH1, BH2, BD1, BE1, BC2). Such spatial differentiation of hydrogeochemical processes has also been reported by Adimalla & Qian (2019), underscoring the strength of PCA in delineating contamination hotspots.
Figure 8: Biplot Relationship between Water Quality Parameters and Sampling Points
The dispersion of data points along the axes provides insights into the spatial heterogeneity of groundwater quality in the study area. Locations with closely positioned observations, such as BE1 and BE2, or BG1 and BG2, suggest similar physicochemical properties, while those that are widely scattered, such as BC1 and WC1, exhibit diverse water quality characteristics. This differentiation highlights the variability in groundwater sources and the potential impact of both natural and anthropogenic factors. The findings suggest that some groundwater sources are more significantly impacted by salinity, mineral dissolution, and anthropogenic activities, whereas others are influenced by their natural buffering capacity and oxygenation processes. The findings from the biplot indicate that some groundwater sources are more affected by salinity, mineral dissolution, and anthropogenic activities, while others are influenced by natural buffering capacity and oxygenation processes.
The AHC results reveal strong spatial and seasonal variability in groundwater quality across Kano, with well sources in both dry and wet seasons showing higher variance compared to borehole sources. The high variance of wells, particularly in the dry season, indicates greater susceptibility to surface contamination and fluctuating recharge, consistent with findings by Edet & Okereke (2014) in southeastern Nigeria. The distinct outlier cluster observed in WA2 during the wet season further demonstrates unique geochemical conditions, a pattern also noted by Ali et al. (2021) in Egyptian aquifers where isolated clusters represented less-contaminated sources. Seasonal recharge plays a critical role in shaping variability, as seen in Cluster 3, where increased wet season runoff mobilized contaminants, mirroring observations from Ibrahim et al. (2022) in Abuja. By contrast, borehole clusters displayed lower variance, suggesting more geochemical stability, which aligns with Wali et al. (2018) who reported that deeper aquifers in Sokoto maintained consistent water chemistry compared to shallow wells.
The clustering of parameters further illustrates contamination pathways and geochemical controls in Kano groundwater. TEMP, pH, DO, BOD, turbidity, and nutrients such as nitrate and sulfate are grouped together, highlighting organic and agricultural contamination sources. This finding aligns with Babika & Tukur, (2022), who attributed similar clustering in Kano peri-urban wells to sewage infiltration and fertilizer use. Conversely, parameters such as TDS, EC, chloride, and bicarbonate formed distinct clusters, reflecting the influence of salinity and buffering processes on lithological interactions, similar to those observed by Li et al. (2019) in northern China. The higher centroid distances observed for organic and microbial indicators relative to salinity parameters confirm stronger variability in anthropogenic pollution, a finding consistent with Obiora et al. (2019) in Enugu, where nitrate and turbidity dispersed widely while EC and chloride remained stable.
Table 6: Distances between the Central Objects for Sample Sites
| Variable | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Std. deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEMP | 22.300 | 29.500 | 25.813 | 2.113 |
| pH | 6.000 | 8.600 | 7.194 | 0.579 |
| DO | 4.600 | 6.600 | 5.425 | 0.458 |
| BOD | 0.610 | 1.930 | 1.270 | 0.358 |
| TDS | 94.000 | 759.000 | 321.775 | 211.321 |
| TURB | 1.380 | 8.630 | 4.360 | 2.046 |
| EC | 105.500 | 392.800 | 236.831 | 79.367 |
| No3 | 0.550 | 3.540 | 1.530 | 0.718 |
| Cl | 94.300 | 687.030 | 314.076 | 158.793 |
| HCO3 | 26.400 | 652.800 | 132.933 | 118.048 |
| SO4 | 0.050 | 1.501 | 0.506 | 0.305 |
| Ca | 0.150 | 1.140 | 0.553 | 0.226 |
| Mg | 0.188 | 22.600 | 1.066 | 3.931 |
| Na | 0.070 | 2.810 | 0.374 | 0.467 |
| k | 0.130 | 3.183 | 0.696 | 0.555 |
Figure 9: Dendrogram of Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering for Groundwater Sample Sites
Figure 10: Dendrogram of Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering for Groundwater Quality Parameters
The Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering (AHC) analysis has provided significant insights into the spatial and seasonal variability of groundwater quality in Kano Metropolis. The results revealed five distinct clusters of groundwater sampling points, reflecting differences in water sources (boreholes and wells) and seasonal influences. Borehole water samples exhibited relatively stable quality, while well water samples demonstrated greater seasonal variability, indicating a higher susceptibility to surface contamination. The clustering of physicochemical parameters further highlighted key contributors to groundwater quality degradation, with salinity-related factors (TDS, EC, Cl) forming distinct clusters separate from organic pollutants (BOD, turbidity, NO₃) and industrial contaminants (SO₄, Na, Mg).
The hydrogeochemical characterization of groundwater in Kano Metropolis was conducted using Piper trilinear diagrams, which provide insights into the dominant cation-anion compositions and hydrogeochemical facies of the sampled water. Piper diagrams are widely used in groundwater studies to classify water types and identify geochemical processes influencing water quality (Igibah and Tanko, 2019; Changsheng et al., 2022). The analysis was performed for both dry and wet seasons, as well as for boreholes and wells, to assess seasonal and source-related variations. This classification helps in understanding aquifer geochemistry, evaluating potential contamination sources, and tracing the evolution of groundwater chemistry over time (Siddha and Sahu, 2022).
The Piper diagram for dry season groundwater samples (Figure 7) illustrates the distribution of major cations and anions. The left ternary diagram (cation plot) shows a predominance of alkaline earth metals (Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺) over alkali metals (Na⁺ and K⁺), indicating that groundwater in Kano Metropolis is primarily hard water. This composition suggests that the water chemistry is strongly influenced by the dissolution of carbonate and sulphate minerals, which are common in sedimentary rock formations. The dominance of calcium and magnesium points to the presence of limestone, dolomite, and gypsum, which release these ions into the groundwater through water-rock interactions (Yan et al., 2024).
The right ternary diagram (anion plot) reveals that sulphate (SO₄²⁻) and chloride (Cl⁻) are the dominant anions, surpassing bicarbonate (HCO₃⁻) and nitrate (NO₃²⁻). The elevated levels of sulphate and chloride indicate that groundwater chemistry is influenced by evaporation effects, industrial discharges, agricultural runoff, and potential contamination from urban sources. High chloride concentrations are commonly linked to sewage infiltration, waste disposal, and leachates from industrial activities (Hu et al., 2024).
The diamond plot, which integrates cationic and anionic compositions, classifies most groundwater samples as belonging to the Ca-Mg-SO₄-Cl facies. This water type is commonly found in semi-arid regions, where high evaporation rates result in increased solute concentrations in groundwater. The dominance of sulphate implies fertilizer application or natural gypsum dissolution, while the strong presence of chloride reinforces the role of industrial and domestic waste contributions (Sharma and Kumar, 2020; Dou et al., 2022).
The observed hydrogeochemical patterns align with the climatic conditions of Kano Metropolis, where intense evaporation leads to increased mineralization of groundwater, especially during the dry season (Tukur et al., 2018). The Piper diagram results suggest that water-rock interactions, anthropogenic influences, and climatic effects are the primary drivers of groundwater chemistry in this period.
The Piper diagram for wet-season groundwater samples (Figure 8) exhibits a similar cationic composition to that of the dry season, with Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ remaining dominant. However, the anion distribution shows a relative increase in bicarbonate (HCO₃⁻) due to rainfall recharge and surface water infiltration, which enhances carbonate dissolution.
Fig 11: Plot for Dry Season Groundwater Chemistry
Fig 12: Plot for Wet season Groundwater Chemistry
This dilution effect results in a slight reduction in chloride and sulfate concentrations, as observed in other recharge-dominated aquifers (Amroune et al., 2020). The central diamond plot for wet season samples indicates a predominant Ca-Mg-Cl-SO₄ hydro chemical facies, similar to the dry season but with a more clustered distribution. This suggests that rainfall recharge helps moderate solute concentrations in groundwater, reducing the degree of mineralization observed in the dry season. However, the persistence of chloride-rich water types suggests that anthropogenic influences, such as domestic wastewater, urban runoff, and industrial discharges, continue to impact groundwater quality, even during the wet season (Sahoo et al., 2024).
This dilution effect results in a slight reduction in chloride and sulfate concentrations, as observed in other recharge-dominated aquifers (Amroune et al., 2020). The central diamond plot for wet season samples indicates a predominant Ca-Mg-Cl-SO₄ hydro chemical facies, similar to the dry season but with a more clustered distribution. This suggests that rainfall recharge helps moderate solute concentrations in groundwater, reducing the degree of mineralization observed in the dry season. However, the persistence of chloride-rich water types suggests that anthropogenic influences, such as domestic wastewater, urban runoff, and industrial discharges, continue to impact groundwater quality, even during the wet season (Sahoo et al., 2024).
The seasonal variation observed in the Piper diagrams highlights the impact of hydrogeochemical processes and anthropogenic activities on groundwater chemistry. While wet-season recharge helps dilute solute concentrations, the persistence of sulfate and chloride dominance indicates continued contamination risks from human activities. The Piper diagram results suggest that water-rock interactions, anthropogenic inputs, and seasonal variations are the key drivers shaping groundwater chemistry in the study area. This finding is in agreement with those of Mustapha et al. (2021), who concluded that water-rock interaction processes and anthropogenic influences impact groundwater quality in the downstream section of the Kano-Challawa River system.
The Piper diagram analysis also highlights variations in borehole and well water chemistry, influenced by aquifer depth, recharge sources, and anthropogenic activities (Akhtar et al., 2021). The groundwater samples from both boreholes and wells, as indicated in Figures 9 and 10, predominantly fall under the Ca-Mg-SO₄-Cl facies, reflecting the strong influence of alkaline earth metals and sulfate-chloride-dominant anions. However, distinct variations exist between boreholes and wells, suggesting differences in hydrogeological conditions and susceptibility to contamination. Borehole samples exhibit a more stable Ca-Mg-SO₄-Cl water type, which is indicative of deeper groundwater flow, prolonged water-rock interactions, and reduced vulnerability to surface contamination. In contrast, well water samples exhibit greater dispersion in cationic composition, indicating a stronger influence from local lithology, leaching from sediments, and anthropogenic activities such as agricultural runoff and infiltration of domestic waste.
Groundwater chemistry in both boreholes and wells undergoes significant seasonal fluctuations. During the wet season, increased precipitation enhances aquifer recharge, leading to the dilution of dissolved ions in shallow wells. However, increased surface infiltration can introduce contaminants, including nitrates, microbial pollutants, and organic matter, raising potential health risks. Conversely, during the dry season, reduced recharge and increased evaporation lead to higher ion concentrations, particularly in wells, where water levels may drop, causing enhanced mineral dissolution. Boreholes, due to their greater depth and confined nature, exhibit more stable hydrochemical characteristics with minimal seasonal variation. However, slight increases in sulfate and chloride concentrations suggest a prolonged water residence time and possible contributions from anthropogenic sources.
Fig 13:Piper Plots for Boreholes Water Samples
Fig 14: Plots for Wells Water Samples
The hydrogeochemical variations observed in boreholes and wells have important implications for groundwater quality management in Kano Metropolis. Boreholes generally provide a more reliable and chemically stable water source for domestic and agricultural use (Lapworth et al., 2017), though elevated sulphate (SO₄²⁻) and chloride (Cl⁻) concentrations in some borehole samples may indicate potential salinity issues due to rock-water interactions and anthropogenic inputs. On the other hand, well water is more susceptible to seasonal variations and external contamination, with higher Na⁺ and K⁺ concentrations in some samples indicating potential sewage infiltration, fertilizer leaching, and other human-induced influences. Generally, the classification of groundwater facies using Piper diagrams provided crucial insights into the hydrogeochemical evolution of groundwater in the study area. The observed trends suggest that water-rock interactions, evaporation, recharge processes, and human activities collectively shape the groundwater chemistry of Kano Metropolis. This is similar to the report by Mshelia (2023) in a study on spatiotemporal variations of physicochemical parameters of water quality in Kano Metropolis.
This study demonstrates that both natural hydrogeochemical processes and anthropogenic activities significantly influence groundwater quality in Kano Metropolis. Seasonal variations are pronounced, with the dry season showing elevated concentrations of salinity-related parameters (TDS, Cl) due to reduced dilution and increased evaporation. The primary contamination sources identified are salinity/mineralization, carbonate dissolution, organic pollution, and industrial/agricultural inputs. Boreholes generally offer more stable water quality than open wells, which are highly vulnerable to surface contamination. The persistent exceedance of Hazard Quotients for chloride and other parameters indicates a potential non-carcinogenic health risk. To mitigate these risks, it is imperative to establish and enforce legally mandated sanitary protection zones around all public boreholes and wells , and to implement a mandatory quarterly groundwater quality monitoring program, focusing on chloride and nitrate levels in vulnerable open wells. These actions are crucial first steps toward safeguarding public health and ensuring the sustainability of this vital resource.
I would like to express my sincere gratitude and appreciation to Dr M.Z. Karkarna and Dr. N.U. Kura for their unwavering support, valuable time, and constant encouragement throughout the course of this study. Their guidance and mentorship have been instrumental to the successful completion of this research.
Adimalla, N., & Qian, H. (2019). Groundwater quality evaluation using Water Quality Index (WQI) for drinking purposes and human health risk (HHR) assessment in an agricultural region of Nanganur, South India. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 176, 153–161. [Crossref]
Akhtar, N., Ishak, M. I. S., Ahmad, M. I., Umar, K. M. D., Yusuff, M. S., Anees, M. T., Qadir, A. A., & Almanasir, Y. K. (2021). Modification of the Water Quality Index (WQI) process for simple calculation using the Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) method: A review. Water, 13(7), 905. [Crossref]
Alao, J. O., Bello, A. Y., Lawal, H. A., & Abdullahi, D. (2024). Assessment of groundwater challenge and the sustainable management strategies. Results in Earth Sciences, 2, 100049. [Crossref]
Ali, A. F. (2012). Groundwater pollution threats of solid waste disposal in urban Kano, Nigeria: Evaluation and protection strategies [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. University of Manchester.
Ali, M., Embaby, A., & others (2021). Hydrogeochemical processes controlling groundwater in Western Sohag Governorate, Upper Egypt. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14, 789. [Crossref]
Aliyu, A. A., & Amadu, L. (2017). Urbanization, cities, and health: The challenges to Nigeria-A review. Annals of African Medicine, 16(4), 149–158. [Crossref]
American Public Health Association. (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (21st ed.).
American Public Health Association. (2008). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater.
Amroune, A., Mihoub, R., Enrico, G., & Carlos, U. N. (2020). Groundwater flow dynamics and distribution of hydrochemical facies using GIS in Hodna Plain, M'Sila, Southeastern Algeria. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 15(6), 789–800. [Crossref]
Ashraf, B., AghaKouchak, A., Alizadeh, A., Mousavi Baygi, M., Moftakhari, H. R., Mirchi, A., & Madani, K. (2017). Quantifying anthropogenic stress on groundwater resources. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 12910. [Crossref]
Babika, Z. M., & Tukur, A. I. (2022). Spatial correlation of groundwater pollutants with the vulnerability index in Kano Metropolis, North-western Nigeria. Water Practice & Technology, 17(12), 2516–2537. [Crossref]
Balogun, D. O., Okewu, A. A., Maikano, A. A., Ibrahim, A., Sule, N. H. I., & Abdullahi, M. M. (2021). Groundwater quality assessment of Kano Metropolis using Water Quality Index and geospatial techniques. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 10(7), 19–28. [Crossref]
Barau, A. S., Maconachie, R., Ludin, A. N. M., & Abdulhamid, A. (2015). Urban morphology dynamics and environmental change in Kano, Nigeria. Land Use Policy, 42, 307–317. [Crossref]
Belkhiria, L.; Mounib, L.; Boudoukha, A. Geochemical evolution of groundwater in an alluvial aquifer: Case of El Eulma aquifer, East Algeria. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2012, 66, 46–55. [Crossref]
Bello, B. Y. (2021). Spatial-temporal variability in the water quality of hand dug wells in Minna and environs, Niger State, Nigeria [Doctoral dissertation].
Boyi, S., Yusuf, Y. O., Sawa, B. A., & Adegbehin, A. B. (2017). An assessment of the physicochemical qualities of water sources in Kano Metropolis, Nigeria. Zaria Geographer, 24(1), 127–138. [Crossref]
Chakraborty, B., Roy, S., Bera, B., Adhikary, P. P., Bhattacharjee, S., & Sengupta, D. (2022). Evaluation of groundwater quality and its impact on human health: A case study from Chotanagpur plateau fringe region in India. Applied Water Science, 12(25), 1–13. [Crossref]
Chakraborty, S., Mukherjee, S., & Kumar, R. (2022). Seasonal variation of groundwater quality and associated health risk assessment in a semi-arid region of India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 194(9), 1–18. [Crossref]
Changsheng, H., Akram, W., Rashid, A., Ullah, Z., Shah, M., Alrefaei, A. F., & Abdel-Daim, M. M. (2022). Quality Assessment of Groundwater Based on Geochemical Modelling and Water Quality Index (WQI). Water, 14(23), 3888. [Crossref]
Cherif, A., El Mandour, A., Amrani, M., & El Hammoumi, I. (2020). Health risk assessment of nitrate contamination in groundwater: Case of Beni Moussa, Tadla Plain, Morocco. Geoenvironmental Disasters, 7(1), 1–16. [Crossref]
Dauda, G., & Ali, A. M. (2024). Delineating leachate-groundwater interaction at Gyadi-Gyadi dumpsite, Kano, using natural electromagnetic (EM) field detector and vertical electrical sounding (VES). Geosystems and Geoenvironment, 3(4), 100303. [Crossref]
Dayyabu, F., Karkarna, M. Z., & Kura, N. U. (2025). Determination of Physicochemical and Bacteriological Quality of some underground water in Selected Areas. Dutse Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences (DUJOPAS), 11(3a), 131–146. [Crossref]
Dou, W., Peng, X., Kong, L., & Hu, X. (2022). A review on the removal of Cl⁻ with high concentration from industrial wastewater: Approaches and mechanisms. Science of The Total Environment, 824, 153909. [Crossref]
Edet, A. (2017). Hydrogeology and groundwater evaluation of a shallow coastal aquifer, southern Akwa Ibom State (Nigeria). Applied Water Science, 7, 2397–2412. [Crossref]
Embaby, A., et al. (2023). Impacts of hydrochemical processes on groundwater quality. Egyptian Journal of Food Science and Technology Research, 3(2), 55–70. [Crossref]
Ezea, V. C., Ihedioha, J. N., Abugu, H. O., & Ekere, N. R. (2022). A multi-criteria approach to drinking and irrigation water assessment of spring water in Igbo-Etiti, Nigeria. Applied Water Science, 12(220), 1–16. [Crossref]
Gawle, S., Pateria, K., & Mishra, R. P. (2021). Physico-chemical analysis of groundwater during monsoon and winter season of Dindori District, India. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 12, 100550. [Crossref]
Haruna, M., Ibrahim, M. K., & Shaibu, U. M. (2019). Assessment of land use and vegetative cover in Kano Metropolis (1975-2015) employing GIS and remote sensing technology. Nigerian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 27(2), 1–7. [Crossref]
Hu, X., Li, B., Zhang, B., Yang, Y., Cai, X., Gong, X., & Wu, T. (2024). Hydrochemical analysis and comprehensive quality assessment of groundwater in the densely populated coastal industrial city. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 63, 105440. [Crossref]
Ibrahim, M. N. (2019). Assessing groundwater quality for drinking purpose in Jordan: Application of Water Quality Index. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 20(3), 101–111. [Crossref]
Igibah, C. E., & Tanko, J. A. (2019). Assessment of urban groundwater quality using Piper trilinear and multivariate techniques: a case study in the Abuja, North-central, Nigeria. Environmental Systems Research, 8, 1-14. [Crossref]
Isa, N. M., & Aris, A. Z. (2012). Preliminary assessment on the hydrogeochemistry of Kapas Island, Terengganu. Sains Malaysiana, 41(1), 23–32.
Isa, U. F., Liman, M. A., Mohammed, M. U., Mathew, O. S., & Yayo, Y. R. (2016). Spatial analysis of fire service stations in Kano Metropolis, Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 21(9, Ver. 1), 42-52. [Crossref]
Jain, C. K., Kumar, C. P., & Sharma, M. K. (2021). Health risk assessment of nitrate contamination in groundwater of Rajasthan, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 193(5), 1–15. [Crossref]
Kasem, A. M., Xu, Z., Jiang, H., Liu, W., Zhang, J., & Nosair, A. M. (2024). Nitrate Source and Transformation in Groundwater under Urban and Agricultural Arid Environment in the Southeastern Nile Delta, Egypt. Water, 16(1), 22. [Crossref]
Kayode, M. O., Tomori, W. B., Okoronkwo, E. A., & et al. (2024). Seasonal variation of groundwater quality in a basement complex geology of Ado Ekiti Nigeria using water quality index model. Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Applied Sciences. [Crossref]
Kılıç, Z. (2020). The importance of water and conscious use of water. International Journal of Hydrology, 4(5), 239–241. [Crossref]
Kura, N. U., Ramli, M. F., Sulaiman, W. N. A., Ibrahim, S., & Aris, A. Z. (2018). An overview of groundwater chemistry studies in Malaysia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(8), 7231–7249. [Crossref]
Kura, N.U., Ramli, M.F., Sulaiman, W.N.A., Ibrahim, S., Aris, A.Z. and Mustapha, A. (2013) Evaluation of factors influencing the groundwater chemistry in a small tropical island of Malaysia. Int J Environ Res Public Health 10(5):1861–1881. [Crossref]
Lapworth, D. J., Boving, T. B., Kreamer, D. K., Kebede, S., & Smedley, P. L. (2022). Groundwater quality: Global threats, opportunities and realizing the potential of groundwater. Science of The Total Environment, 811, 152471. [Crossref]
Lapworth, D. J., Nkhuwa, D. C. W., Okotto-Okotto, J., Pedley, S., Stuart, M. E., Tijani, M. N., & Wright, J. J. H. J. (2017). Urban groundwater quality in sub-Saharan Africa: Current status and implications for water security and public health. Hydrogeology Journal, 25(4), 1093–1116. [Crossref]
Li, J., Huang, L., Zou, L., Kano, Y., Sato, T. and Yahara, T. (2019). Spatial and Temporal Variation of Fish Assemblages and their Associations to Habitat Variables in a Mountain Stream of North Tiaoxi River, China. Environmental Biology of Fishes 93: 403-417. [Crossref]
Mackie, C., Lackey, R., & Levison, J. (2025). Geospatial Analysis of Chloride Hot Spots and Groundwater Vulnerability in Southern Ontario, Canada. Water, 17(16), 2484. [Crossref]
Mshelia, S. S. (2023). Spatiotemporal variations of physicochemical parameters of water quality in Kano Metropolis, Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Impact and Management Policy, 3(2), 27–41. [Crossref]
Mshelia, S. S. (2024). Effects of industrial wastewater on groundwater quality in Challawa industrial layout, Kano Metropolis, Nigeria. International Journal of Research in Leadership, Governance and Development Issues, 4(1), 55–66.
Mukhtar, N. Y., Umar, I. K., & Ibrahim, A. (2021). Water quality evaluation of some boreholes and dug-wells in Dorayi, Kano, Nigeria. Desalination and Water Treatment, 215, 398–404. [Crossref]
Mustapha, A., Aris, A. Z., Juahir, H., & Ramli, M. F. (2013). Surface water quality contamination source apportionment and physicochemical characterization at the upper section of the Jakara Basin, Nigeria. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 6, 4903–4915. [Crossref]
Mustapha, A., Sagagi, B. S., Daura, M. M., Idris Tanko, A., Phil-Eze, P. O., & Isiyaka, H. A. (2021). Geochemical evolution and quality assessment of groundwater resources at the downstream section of the Kano-Challawa River system, Northwest Nigeria. International Journal of River Basin Management, 19(1), 1–33. [Crossref]
Nascimento, V. A., Kleinermanns, K., Martin, W. F., & Preiner, M. (2020). The ambivalent role of water at the origins of life. FEBS Letters, 594(17), 2717–2733. [Crossref]
National Library of Medicine. (2021). The cholera risk assessment in Kano State Nigeria: A historical review, mapping hotspots and evaluation of contextual factors. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 15(2), e0009046. [Crossref]
O’Rourke, N.; Hatcher, L.; Stepanski, E.J. A Step-by-Step Approach to Using SAS for Univariate & Multivariate Statistics, 2nd ed.; SAS Publishing: Cary, NC, USA, 2005.
Obiora, S. C., & Chukwu, A. (2019). Assessment of heavy metals in topsoil and street dust from the city of Kano, Nigeria. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191(1), 4. [Crossref]
Olofin, E. A., & Tanko, A. I. (2002). Metropolitan Kano in geographic perspective. Department of Geography, Bayero University.
Omole, D. O. (2018). Sustainable groundwater exploitation in Nigeria. Journal of Water Resources and Ocean Science, 2(2), 9–14. [Crossref]
Onoyima, C. C., Okpanachi, C. B., & Akoji, J. N. (2025). Hydro-geochemical Characterization and Groundwater Quality Assessment of Mariri Aquifer, Kano, Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development, 119(1), 469–486. [Crossref]
Rilwanu, T. Y. (2014). Groundwater potential assessment for rural water supply in parts of Kano State, Nigeria [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Ahmadu Bello University.
Sahoo, T., Panda, J., Swain, S., Sahoo, S. K., Maurya, M., Hembram, M., & Sahu, R. (2024). Integrated geochemical analysis of groundwater quality and human health risks by using multivariate statistical methods: A case study of Mayurbhanj District, Odisha, India. Research Square (Preprint). [Crossref]
Shaikh, M., & Birajdar, F. (2024). Groundwater and public health: Exploring the connections and challenges. International Journal for Innovative Science Research Trends and Innovation, 9(2), 1351–1361. [Crossref]
Sharma, M. K., & Kumar, M. (2020). Sulphate contamination in groundwater and its remediation: An overview. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192(1), 1–10. [Crossref]
Shawai, S. A. A., Abubakar, B. B., Nahannu, M. S., & Gaya, H. S. (2019). Status of water used for drinking and irrigation in Kano: A critical review on physicochemical and heavy metals concentration. American Journal of Biomedical Science & Research, 5(3), 235–242. [Crossref]
Shuaibu, A., Kalin, R. M., Phoenix, V., Banda, L. C., & Lawal, I. M. (2024). Hydrogeochemistry and Water Quality Index for Groundwater Sustainability in the Komadugu-Yobe Basin, Sahel Region. Water, 16(4), 601. [Crossref]
Siddha, S., & Sahu, P. (2022). Understanding the geochemical evolution of groundwater in Central Gujarat, India: an integrated hydrogeochemical and multivariate statistical approach. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 15(12), 1117
Talabi, A. O. (2018). Estimated volume of water in shallow wells of Ekiti State, Southwestern Nigeria: Implications on groundwater sustainability. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 11(21), 681. [Crossref]
Tukur, A. I., Nabegu, A. B., Umar, D. A., Olofin, E. A., & Sulaiman, W. N. A. (2018). Groundwater condition and management in Kano region, Northwestern Nigeria. Hydrology, 5(1), 1–14. [Crossref]
Umar, A. T., & Gada, M. A. (2015). Pattern of rainfall anomalies and rural water supply in Sudano-Sahelian region of Nigeria. In Facing the threat: Climate change (pp. 203–217).
Wali SU, Umar KJ, Dankani IM, Abubakar SD, Gada MA, Umar A. (2018). Groundwater Hydrochemical Characterization in Urban Areas of Southwestern Sokoto Basin Nigeria. SF J Environ Earth Sci.1(1): 1006. ISSN 2643-807
World Health Organization. (2011). Guidelines for drinking-water quality (4th ed.). [Link]
World Health Organization. (2019). Drinking-water quality. [Link]
Yan, M., Wang, L., Wang, Q., & Liu, Z. (2024). Hydrochemical characteristics and origin analysis of groundwater in Nanling County, Anhui Province. Water, 16(11), 1579. [Crossref]
Yao, Y., Tu, C., Hu, G., Zhang, Y., Cao, H., Wang, W., & Wang, W. (2024). Groundwater Hydrochemistry and Recharge Process Impacted by Human Activities in an Oasis-Desert in Central Asia. Water, 16(5), 763. [Crossref]