Coping with Emerging Educational Challenges in the Mid of Global Economic Crises; An Empirical Evidence of Sagone and Decaroli’s Academic Self-Efficacy Scale

Authors

  • Muhammad Garba Ahmad Department of Education, Bayero University Kano, Nigeria Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70886/ujer.25131.001

Keywords:

Empirical evidence, Academic Self-efficacy, Validation, Educational-challenge

Abstract

The paper discussed the general steps taken in the validation of the Undergraduate Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (UASES) adapted from Sagone, and De-Caroli, (2014). The instrument is on 4-points Likert Scale format, with 27 items. The validation involved 200 undergraduates of Federal University Dutsin-ma, Katsina State. Face, content and construct validity as well as internal consistency reliability were sought. The instrument was validated by the experts. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) aided the analysis. Content validity Ratio (CVR) was established; the analysis showed has 0.93 validity ratio. To establish the construct validity of the instrument, discriminant validity process was adopted. Pearson Products Moment Correlation Coefficient was used in the analysis; and good discriminant validity index of .084 was obtained between UASES and Copenhagen Study Burnout Scale (CSBS). The study also revealed overall internal consistency reliability coefficient of, the instrument showed high reliability coefficient. It was therefore concluded and recommended that the instrument is valid and reliable to collect data on Academic Self-efficacy among undergraduates in north-western Nigeria as one of the challenges of university education.

References

Campos, J. D. B., Carlotto, M. S., & Maroco, J. (2013). Copenhagen burnout inventory-students version: Adaption and transcultural validation for Portugal and Brazil. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 26(1), 87–97.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morris, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). London & New York: Routledge.

Kimberlin, C. L., & Winterstein, A. G. (2008). Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research: Research fundamentals. University of Florida, Gainesville.

Nikolopoulou, K. (2022). What is discriminant validity? Definition and example. Retrieved June 18, 2023, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/discriminant/validity

Paul, D. L., & Ellis, O. J. (2015). Practical research: Planning and design (11th ed., Global ed.). England: Pearson Education Limited.

Paulsen, J., & Brckalorenz, A. (2017). Internal consistency reliability. FSSE Psychometric Portfolio. Retrieved from https://fsse.indiana.edu

Sagone, E., & De-Caroli, M. E. (2014). Locus of control and academic self-efficacy in university students: The effects of self-concepts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 114, 222–228.

Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). General self-efficacy scale (GSE).

Downloads

Published

2025-01-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ahmad, M. G. (2025). Coping with Emerging Educational Challenges in the Mid of Global Economic Crises; An Empirical Evidence of Sagone and Decaroli’s Academic Self-Efficacy Scale. UMYU Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.70886/ujer.25131.001

Similar Articles

1-10 of 32

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.